2012
Director: Nick Love
Writer: Nick Love
Something I should really do more is to go to see films I
wouldn’t normally see. Sure it can be a bit hit and miss but I’ve been
pleasantly surprised with how good some of them ended up being. Even better is
seeing films I know nothing about and therefore going in without the tainting
of prior expectations. So it was a Sunday afternoon and I was unbelievably
bored at home when my parents announced they were going out to see The Sweeney and were asking if I wanted
to tag along. I didn’t know much about it, other than a few majorly negative
reviews. Dad wanted to see it due to his being a big fan of the original TV
show in the 70s and was hoping this remake would live up to his high regard for
it. To be honest I wasn’t bothered, but I bugger all else to do and hey, it’s a
free film- why not? It might be fun.
With the amount I know about the original series, going into
this was pretty much like knowing nothing. The original show from the mid 1970s
starred the great John Thaw and Dennis Waterman as two detectives. That’s all I
knew. According to Wikipedia, the title refers to Sweeney Todd, the cockney
rhyming slang for Flying Squad, a branch of the police which deals with violent
crime and armed robbery. With its themes of police brutality, violent crime and
the cutting of corners and bending of laws to ultimately get the job done, this
seems to fall within the guise of the Dirty
Harry imitators I mentioned a few posts ago. The Sweeney was supposedly
remarkable in its time for showing a high degree of realism as well as more
brutal and flawed characters and far more onscreen violence than any other cop
drama.

Although probably why they stand out so much is because the
rest of the film doesn’t offer so much. The plot is unfortunately pretty
feeble- the whole investigation is pretty slight with much of their progress
coming via informants, helpful coincidence or the odd bit of violent
interrogation which isn’t the most satisfying or engaging of stories. Frankly
it was hard to care who was actually behind the crime because it just wasn’t
interesting enough. I know this wasn’t going to be Agatha Christie-levels of
intricate pacing and deviant plot twists but I was hoping for a little more
bone for all the meat.

My Dad said afterwards that this wasn’t a bad film but he
was disappointed with it. For him it did have the legacy of the TV show to live
up to but ultimately I agree. It was a relatively enjoyable if forgettable
action film which thankfully delivered on its main promise. I suppose it was
better for me than I knew nothing about the show; this was no more than run of
the mill generic action. Although in some ways it couldn’t help actually
feeling a little bit dated despite its modern day setting. The plotting, the
OTT shootouts, the themes of violent police retaliation and the debate over
whether these methods are superior to the red tape of following by the book
would fit better in the 1970s when problems within the real life Flying Squad
were making news, whereas here they don’t gel as well with modern conventions
of crime drama- such as the ethics of punishment or the focus on details and
technology in the solving process. Plus who actually robs banks nowadays? The
criminals break into a supposedly exclusive and private bank with surprising
ease which just doesn’t ring true. Again, it’s not a bad film (although there
were some badly done matching on actions which irritated me a bit), I guess it’s
just not a very good film either. It was made by Nick Love, the man behind
other such emancipated male fantasies like The
Football Factory (2004) and The
Business (2005) which work perfectly well in their own ways; it’s just like
this, they don’t appeal to me- beating other guys to a pulp isn’t really my
idea of fun.